Common inputs — same deposits, same withdrawals, two ways to manage

Scenario A — spend down assets

Every cashout is taken out of the portfolio: while saving, only the leftover (earning − cashout need) is invested; afterwards the yearly cashout is withdrawn directly from assets.

Scenario B — leverage against assets

Cash needs are borrowed, so assets are never touched except for the premium. The loan compounds and is never repaid; "out of money" means the loan catches up with the assets (net worth ≤ 0).

Different Outputs

Scenario A — spend down assets

Scenario B — leverage against assets

The same cash need, funded two ways

Year 1 — saving
Bucket comparison of the two scenarios Scenario A is one bucket: earnings pour in while working, and every cash need is drained straight out of it, so it empties. Scenario B is two buckets: earnings fill the asset bucket and are never spent, while the same cash need is borrowed into a second bucket that fills as a loan. The asset bucket keeps rising and stays ahead of the loan. A — Spend down assets Earnings in Cash out $0 Assets = net worth B — Leverage against assets Earnings in, never spent Same cash, borrowed Asset cost buys the benefit secures $0 1 · Assets, untouched $0 2 · Loan balance

A — spend the cash

Spending takes a slice out of the pie A pie of one hundred thousand dollars with a twenty thousand dollar slice cut away and moved aside, leaving eighty thousand dollars behind. $80,000 $20,000 the slice is gone for good $80,000 keeps compounding

Every dollar spent leaves the pie. Next year's need comes out of a smaller one, and the year after that out of one smaller still.

B — borrow the cash

Borrowing leaves the pie whole A whole pie of one hundred thousand dollars, with dashed lines showing where a twenty thousand dollar slice would have been cut, and that slice drawn separately outside the pie as a loan. $100,000 $20,000 borrowed, not cut $100,000 keeps compounding

You take the same $20,000, but the pie is never cut. The whole $100,000 goes on compounding while the loan compounds more slowly beside it.

Water levels are the calculator's own numbers — each bucket is that year's end-of-year balance from the table below. All three share one fixed scale that never changes as the years run, so a level moves only when the balance does. The scale has to hold the largest balance reached, so a longer Simulation horizon flattens the early years — compounding runs away with the top of the scale. Shorten it to zoom back in. Scenario A drains because every dollar spent leaves the bucket for good and stops compounding. Scenario B never drains bucket 1, so it keeps compounding at the asset growth rate while the loan compounds at the lower loan rate — that gap is the whole mechanism.

Assets, loan, and net worth over time

A net worth B net worth B assets B loan

End-of-year balances

Year Deposit Income A net worth B assets B loan B net worth

Simplified model: all cash flows (savings, premium, cashout, borrowing) happen at the beginning of each year and then grow/accrue for that year; constant rates, loan always available with no loan-to-value cap, and the insurance death benefit is collateral only (not counted in net worth). Real policy loans have borrowing limits and variable rates.